This book is an attempt to draw attention to hermeneutics again as an unavoidable factor in that discourse, and to present the most important positions and methodological problems throughout its history, which is almost as long as the history of philosophy itself.
The thesis of this book is simple: there is room for installing and justifying (as well as, of course, disputing) the idea of “negative engagement.”
“Should the citizenry be encouraged and empowered to participate in deliberative formulation of political decisions and what are the advantages of such participation?”
Cvejić argues for an understanding of feelings as an exercise of subjective causal power of representation.
What We Talk About When We Talk About Ignorance: In Praise of Error offers, above all, a textually and visually richly illustrated history of the perception of status and role of both knowledge and ignorance.
What We Talk About When We Talk About Critique offers a textually and visually richly illustrated historical-philosophical perspective on the status and role of a key, but by no means unambiguous concept
Book seeks to shed light on the complex meaning behind the concept of intellectual, as well as present means of better illuminating the role of the intellectual in social life, in particular in the cultural-symbolic field framed by the national.
