What We Mean when We Say … A New Social Contract
This text presents a plea for the establishment of a new social contract in Serbia, which would be formulated in such a way as to guarantee its initial postulate: the sovereignty of the people.
This text presents a plea for the establishment of a new social contract in Serbia, which would be formulated in such a way as to guarantee its initial postulate: the sovereignty of the people.
The text What We Mean when We Say … Dignified Work is an analysis of the concept of dignified work, as an operational and concrete achievement of the struggle for workers’ rights.
In this publication, Predrag Đurić gives several conditions for successful health system reform
In this publication, Adriana Zaharijević writes about the position of women in Serbia, and the political requirements for changing that position.
In What We Mean when We Say … A New Education System, Milica Sekulović and Olga Nikolić present possible solutions for the state of modern education in Serbia.
The focus of this text is on the current neoliberal crisis. The neoliberal model, which has denied the inherent human vulnerability and interdependence, has unsustainable and devastating consequences, both for individuals and on the social level.
Engagement extends through various spheres of our reality, from private efforts, jobs, contracts, public appearances and participation in the social and political life of the community, to the execution of military commands.
The event binding together the interviews in this book is the May 2020 petition in support of the academic autonomy of the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory of the University of Belgrade.
This book is an attempt to draw attention to hermeneutics again as an unavoidable factor in that discourse, and to present the most important positions and methodological problems throughout its history, which is almost as long as the history of philosophy itself.
The thesis of this book is simple: there is room for installing and justifying (as well as, of course, disputing) the idea of “negative engagement.”